The widely used type 304 stainless steel contains 18 to 20% Cr
and 8 to 10.5% Ni, and is also called 18-8 stainless steel.
"At atmospheric pressure and 300° K., .DELTA.H = 68.315 Kcal/mol of H2O (i) and .DELTA.G = 56.62 Kcal/mole of H2O (i) for the electrolysis of liquid water. Hence, the energy efficiency of electrolysis at 300° K. is about 120%."
"(When) H2 (gas) and O2 (gas) are generated by electrolysis, the electrolysis cell must absorb heat from the surroundings, in order to remain at constant temperature. It is this ability to produce gaseous electrolysis products with heat absorption from the surroundings that is ultimately responsible for energy-conversion efficiencies during electrolysis greater than unity."
In. the original setup that Stan Meyer showed us, he used 36 volts as the basic
potential applied to the reaction chamber. He also commented that
stainless steel ( 410 not 403 ) was the only metal that could be used as oxides
formed with all others. His original chamber used 18 inch long by 0.375 inch
diameter (o.d.) rod surrounded by 1 inch diameter (i.d.) 16 inch long pipe.
The reason for the difference in length is for mechanical ease of construction.
My prototype used 14 inch long rod and 12 inch long pipe of similar diameters
as the drawing indicates.
Having a severe lack of parts diversity here in Sri-Lanka, I was only able to
obtain a 24 volt. 8 amp transformer and built my circuitry around that. The
final output is 20 volts with Ml reading 10 amps to the pulsing circuit which
generates a symetricel squarewave ( 50% duty cycle ) to the flyback inductor
connected in series with the chamber as the schematic shows. The flyback high
voltage spike is directed across the chamber via c* end d*. The use of a high
voltage spike alone, without the current being delivered through the liquid, will
not cause the disassociation to take place. This I verified using an ignition
coil in place of the inductor and applied the secondary with halfwave
rectification and blocking capacitor to prevent burn out to the chamber with no
results. Apparently the current in the water aligns the molecules approprately
to allow the high voltege spike to do its workr which in my opinion is the
stimulation of molecular resonance. Once Stan's unit was made to begin breakdown
(which takes 6 to 8 seconds) he was able to reduce both current and voltage
to miniscule proportions. I attribute this to sympathetic oscillation of the
aligned molecules, requiring very little in the way of additional excitation. A
phenomena akin to Tesla `s super resonance... resulting in Stan discovering that
he only had to supply three pulses in ten to satisfy the requirement of the chamber.
I have not yet had the opportunity to duplicate this portion of the experiment but,
in time I vill.
Duplication of the device described in these pages, however, will produce the
phenomena and hopefully launch other enterprising end inventive souls on to
designing their own refined models. It would be nice to have feedback so that
we can all collectively work to bring about the transition to non-pollution
P.S.- Tho electrical circuit is by no means optinised, but represents
instead the result of parts availability here. Any good technician
could improve on it quite readily.
There are two primary frequencies that produce the best results.
They are. 14372 Hz and 43430 Hz. The former is about 50% more efficient,
but it seems that just about any frequency between 9 KHz and 143762 KHz
works quite well. 1) This is because the nature of the wave form ( a spike ) is
rich in harmonics and one of them is bound to be close to one of the two
Use of permanent magnets may also increase efficiency.
I'll give you the outcome of that attempt in my next letter along with the
plans for what I hope to be a much improved version.
Note: Sub-harmonics of the two primary frequencies at which dissociation will occur:
43430 Hz 143762 HZ
1st 21715 HZ 1st 71881 HZ
2nd 14476.67 HZ 2nd 47920.67 HZ
3rd 15517.5 HZ 3rd 35840.1 HZ
4th 8686 Hz 4th 28752.4 HZ
*1500 VOLTS IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR MOLECULAR RINGING TO BEGIN.
The ball is now in your court.
Let's get the game started and have as many players as possible.
From the legal stand point it can be argued in an international court of law
that the vital need of this technology by every nation to aleviate the critical
threat to our environment globally is so greet as to justify nullification of
proprietry rights if those rights are used to delay or prevent distribution of
the technology and if such delay or prevention - including measured and / or
levied distribution so as to restrict or limit its use, or for the purposes of
financial profit isolate significent economic groups from its use and if such
acts previously mentioned can be shown to cause an increased danger to life,
persons involved in such acts can be convicted of intent to do bodily harm by
crime of omission.
(ANY MATERIAL SENT TO `TUNING IN' WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE ABOVE WRITER.)
Back to the Mad Scientist's Lair
Source publication: Unknown
Scanned from very bad photocopy.\
Dingel Car from Internet Archive